• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ما هو متصفحك؟