#114992: "Game log needs more details of dominance checks"
ما هو هذا التقرير؟
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع
إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، يرجى التصويت لهذا التقرير. يتم إعطاء التقارير ذات أكبر عدد من الأصوات الأولوية!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
وصف مفصل
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.
I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:
A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg
This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.
So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2
-
• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Firefox for Windows
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:
A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg
This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.
So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2
-
• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Firefox for Windows
-
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:
A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg
This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.
So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Firefox for Windows
-
• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)
I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:
A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg
This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.
So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Firefox for Windows
-
• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA
I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:
A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg
This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.
So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2
-
• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Firefox for Windows
-
• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟
I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:
A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg
This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.
So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2
-
• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟
-
• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Firefox for Windows
-
• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟
I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:
A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg
This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.
So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2
-
• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Firefox for Windows
-
• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:
A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg
This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.
So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Firefox for Windows
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:
A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg
This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.
So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2
-
• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Firefox for Windows
-
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:
A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg
This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.
So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Firefox for Windows
سجل التاريخ
اضف لهذا البلاغ
- تعريف طاولة/تعريف حركة
- هل حلَت F5 المشكلة؟
- هل ظهرت المشكلة عدة مرات؟ كل مرة؟ بطريقة عشوائية؟
- إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
