• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.

In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.

I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split.

• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.

I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split.

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.

I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)

In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.

I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA

In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.

I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split.

• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟

In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.

I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split.

• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟

In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.

I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split.

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.

I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.

I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split.

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.

I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split.

• ما هو متصفحك؟