• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.

I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.

Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter.

• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.

Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.

Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)

I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.

Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA

I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.

Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter.

• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟

I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.

Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter.

• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟

I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.

Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter.

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.

Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.

Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.

Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter.

• ما هو متصفحك؟