#124173: "Randomize player order in a rematch"
ما هو هذا التقرير؟
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع
إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، يرجى التصويت لهذا التقرير. يتم إعطاء التقارير ذات أكبر عدد من الأصوات الأولوية!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
وصف مفصل
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v124
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v124
-
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v124
-
• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v124
-
• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v124
-
• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟
-
• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v124
-
• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v124
-
• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v124
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. -
• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v124
-
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"
While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".
Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).
I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games. • ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v124
سجل التاريخ
Two player games should swap starting players on a rematch.
Multi-player games should rotate the starting player and randomize the player order. If rotating the starting player is too much to remember between games, randomizing the starting player (avoiding the previous starting player) is acceptable.
Rearranging seats at the table is totally something we do in real life if we're playing multiple short games.
In real life we use chwazi to determine player order for every game we play. In 7 wonders nobody likes to sit next to the player who likes heavy military and we all want to sit next to the pacifist.
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582
And this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41518
اضف لهذا البلاغ
- تعريف طاولة/تعريف حركة
- هل حلَت F5 المشكلة؟
- هل ظهرت المشكلة عدة مرات؟ كل مرة؟ بطريقة عشوائية؟
- إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
