• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث

Noted above inline.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

Noted above inline.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟

Noted above inline.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟

Noted above inline.

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

Noted above inline.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

Noted above inline.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• ما هو متصفحك؟