• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث

34

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

34

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟

34

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟

34

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

34

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

34

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

Here are before and after screenshots. Total score went from 34 to 32, but the played card (bottom right with the gravel and 3 flowers) should be neutral as far as I can tell - no net changes to elements.

imgur.com/a/FDooCWf

While there is a path diagonal on the board (upper right), and the scored 12 points makes it look like the algorithm is using that way on the path, the path legally forks off before that below it for 14.

Before my play the fork to the right (below the upper right diagonal) was a double wide path, but is now single, so perhaps only half the width was counting before and that is the side of the path width that I covered up with this card.

There are several ways to count 14, but the path calc seems to be stopping at the upper right diagonal (12 length reported for longPath) and ignoring the fork option below it forking off to the right side.

• ما هو متصفحك؟