• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• ما هو متصفحك؟