#21478: "Technology setup bug"
ما هو هذا التقرير؟
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع
إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، يرجى التصويت لهذا التقرير. يتم إعطاء التقارير ذات أكبر عدد من الأصوات الأولوية!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
وصف مفصل
• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث
N/A• ما هو متصفحك؟
Mozilla v5
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
N/A• ما هو متصفحك؟
Mozilla v5
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ما هو متصفحك؟
Mozilla v5
• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ما هو متصفحك؟
Mozilla v5
• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟
N/A• ما هو متصفحك؟
Mozilla v5
• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟
N/A• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Mozilla v5
• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
N/A• ما هو متصفحك؟
Mozilla v5
• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ما هو متصفحك؟
Mozilla v5
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
N/A• ما هو متصفحك؟
Mozilla v5
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ما هو متصفحك؟
Mozilla v5
سجل التاريخ
It appears to be as the report describes.
The code first chooses one of the 1-gold tiles to exclude, and places the remaining ones in row 1.
Then it chooses two of the 2-gold tiles to exclude, and places the remaining ones in row 2.
Instead it should do something like the following:
* Select 6 tiles, and sort them.
* Place the first 3 tiles in row 1.
* Place the last 3 tiles in row 2.
github.com/salty-horse/bga-teotihuacan/commit/bug_21478
I'm working on a fix.
اضف لهذا البلاغ
- تعريف طاولة/تعريف حركة
- هل حلَت F5 المشكلة؟
- هل ظهرت المشكلة عدة مرات؟ كل مرة؟ بطريقة عشوائية؟
- إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.