أبلغ عن • Board Game Arena

جميع التقارير

تقارير cityofthebigshoulders_displayed

#23292: "Price Protection should be once per Decade and optional"

open: لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن

ما هو هذا التقرير؟

cityofthebigshoulders #109126807

ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه

القواعد: لم يتم احترام قاعدة اللعبة

ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه

القواعد: لم يتم احترام قاعدة اللعبة

يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع

إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، يرجى التصويت لهذا التقرير. يتم إعطاء التقارير ذات أكبر عدد من الأصوات الأولوية!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

وصف مفصل

سجل التاريخ

Aug 27 th 2020 23:51 • Joseph2302 • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Company owner should be given option on whether or not to use this tile
And it shouldn't work for the whole decade, as that is too powerful

Aug 28 th 2020 22:43 • mitcharf • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

I agree that it is a powerful capital asset, but it is not intended to work just once per decade. The designer clarified this on BGG here:
boardgamegeek.com/thread/2256464/article/32703243#32703243

In terms of it being optional rather than mandatory, I'm trying to think of a case where I would NOT want to have my stock price protected from dropping. If there are legitimate cases where that would be of possible benefit, then it's worth pursuing that with the game designer, to see what he thinks. Otherwise it seems like it would needlessly delay the game if a player had to be prompted every time to see if they wanted to use it (especially since it can be used multiple times per decade)

Aug 29 th 2020 00:57 • arcadized • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

A player in that game asked the designer and the designer agrees this is bugged here:

www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/2493015/capital-asset-price-protection

Aug 29 th 2020 01:00 • arcadized • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

@mitcharf

Did you even read the link you posted? When I go there I see the designer has edited it to reflect the current version of the rules:

boardgamegeek.com/thread/2256464/article/32703243#32703243

also see the thread I posted:

www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/2493015/capital-asset-price-protection

IF you tool tip over the asset in BGA, you can see BGA is using the current version of the rules. this is a bug and the designer agrees

Aug 29 th 2020 05:00 • mitcharf • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

I've been participating in both of those threads. When I posted my comment here in the bug, it was before the designer had stayed that this was a change for the second edition. I was just coming here now to mention that I was mistaken in my previous comment, but I see you've beaten me to it.

Hopefully you also saw that I asked the designer about whether you can choose when to use this asset, and he replied that you do get to choose.

Aug 29 th 2020 16:52 • arcadized • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Ah, I see now. Sorry, looks like it was a timing issue. Didn't realize that was your thread, I don't use BGG very much. Thanks for coming back to correct the information here.

Aug 29 th 2020 17:18 • mitcharf • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

No problem. We all want the same thing here -- for the BGA version to implement the rules correctly. :)

Aug 30 th 2020 03:49 • ggohierroy • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Hey, so this adaptation was implemented when the 2nd edition rules were still being worked on, and the latest information I had at that time was that Price Protection was a passive ability that could be used multiple times in the same decade.

Now, I understand this has changed with the 2nd edition, but it wouldn't be easy to change with the implementation because it means multiple actions can be interrupted and switch to the player holding price protection because they now have a decision to make. This changes the flow of the game significantly, and in asynchronous games, this also has a big impact.

Just so you know, I have no intention of changing this in the short term because of those reasons. I'll leave it open for visibility.

Sep 12 th 2020 04:28 • alexsim • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

I think it would be reasonable to trigger the Asset automatically the first time it could be used. I can see where there would be edge cases where you wouldn't want it used, but I think the loss from automatically applying it would be less of a problem than letting it work all the time.

Sep 14 th 2020 02:02 • ggohierroy • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

@alexsim

Good idea, but knowing this, a player would use this knowledge to their advantage, making this capital asset go from amazing, to complete shit.

Dec 4 th 2020 22:51 • Neramoor • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Bug appeared in real time game. Price protection not exhausting during stock phase
imgur.com/a/kvZYdhh

Jan 3 rd 2021 00:19 • Nickelz • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Neramoor, the company that lost 3 steps is not the same as the company with the asset.

Jan 18 th 2021 13:48 • attagamer • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

The designer of the game has published a rewording of the capital asset effect on BGG:
boardgamegeek.com/thread/2256464/article/35690787#35690787

I believe the BGA implementation is in accordance with this new/clarified rule.

Jan 19 th 2021 08:53 • attagamer • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Ooops, sorry! I meant that the BGA implementation is in accordance with the v1 rules.

Note the inconsistence between the behaviour (v1) and the tip text when hovering over the capital asset: the latter reflects the v2 rules!

The v2 rules have changed the ability of the capital asset, and the BGA implementation has thus become wrong.

Clarification by Mr Chandler (author) here: boardgamegeek.com/thread/2256464/article/35690787#35690787

He says: "In the Second Edition, this rule has changed to be a "ONCE PER DECADE" ability. It is no longer a passive ability."

Do not forget to grey out the capital asset once used.

Thank you for your time!

Apr 18 th 2021 20:28 • MrGeorge • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

So, to clarify, how do we use this asset to prevent the stock price from dropping during the stock phase?

Apr 22 nd 2021 03:10 • JohnOrigan • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Price protection is currently always enable (passive ability).

To follow the rules, it should protect only once (not implemented)

اضف لهذا البلاغ

الرجاء إضافة أي شيء يبدو هنا ذا صلة من أجل إعادة إنتاج هذا الخطأ أو فهم اقتراحك:

تعريف طاولة/تعريف حركة
هل حلَت F5 المشكلة؟
هل ظهرت المشكلة عدة مرات؟ كل مرة؟ بطريقة عشوائية؟
If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

إلغاء تحديث التقرير

#23292: "Price Protection should be once per Decade and optional"

ما هو هذا التقرير؟

ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه

ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه

يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع

وصف مفصل

سجل التاريخ

اضف لهذا البلاغ

تغيير حالة التقرير إلى:

مساعدة

ساهم

التنقل

تابعنا