• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.

It seems unfair in multi player games that those after the winner are considered equal 2nd. You can be 4 or 5 moves ahead of someone yet loose significant points purely because they are a newer player. Players should be ranked in finishing order and awarded points accordingly, as in the majority of games

• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

It seems unfair in multi player games that those after the winner are considered equal 2nd. You can be 4 or 5 moves ahead of someone yet loose significant points purely because they are a newer player. Players should be ranked in finishing order and awarded points accordingly, as in the majority of games

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

It seems unfair in multi player games that those after the winner are considered equal 2nd. You can be 4 or 5 moves ahead of someone yet loose significant points purely because they are a newer player. Players should be ranked in finishing order and awarded points accordingly, as in the majority of games

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)

It seems unfair in multi player games that those after the winner are considered equal 2nd. You can be 4 or 5 moves ahead of someone yet loose significant points purely because they are a newer player. Players should be ranked in finishing order and awarded points accordingly, as in the majority of games

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA

It seems unfair in multi player games that those after the winner are considered equal 2nd. You can be 4 or 5 moves ahead of someone yet loose significant points purely because they are a newer player. Players should be ranked in finishing order and awarded points accordingly, as in the majority of games

• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟

It seems unfair in multi player games that those after the winner are considered equal 2nd. You can be 4 or 5 moves ahead of someone yet loose significant points purely because they are a newer player. Players should be ranked in finishing order and awarded points accordingly, as in the majority of games

• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟

It seems unfair in multi player games that those after the winner are considered equal 2nd. You can be 4 or 5 moves ahead of someone yet loose significant points purely because they are a newer player. Players should be ranked in finishing order and awarded points accordingly, as in the majority of games

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

It seems unfair in multi player games that those after the winner are considered equal 2nd. You can be 4 or 5 moves ahead of someone yet loose significant points purely because they are a newer player. Players should be ranked in finishing order and awarded points accordingly, as in the majority of games

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

It seems unfair in multi player games that those after the winner are considered equal 2nd. You can be 4 or 5 moves ahead of someone yet loose significant points purely because they are a newer player. Players should be ranked in finishing order and awarded points accordingly, as in the majority of games

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

It seems unfair in multi player games that those after the winner are considered equal 2nd. You can be 4 or 5 moves ahead of someone yet loose significant points purely because they are a newer player. Players should be ranked in finishing order and awarded points accordingly, as in the majority of games

• ما هو متصفحك؟