#34833: "Board positioning: avoid requiring scrolling where possible"
ما هو هذا التقرير؟
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع
إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، يرجى التصويت لهذا التقرير. يتم إعطاء التقارير ذات أكبر عدد من الأصوات الأولوية!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
وصف مفصل
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v79
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v79
-
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v79
-
• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v79
-
• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v79
-
• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟
-
• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v79
-
• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v79
-
• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v79
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v79
-
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v79
سجل التاريخ
I think laying our the boards in the same way as the game Lucky Numbers would be beneficial, as all of the boards are the same size and can be viewed at once without either resizing or scrolling.
اضف لهذا البلاغ
- تعريف طاولة/تعريف حركة
- هل حلَت F5 المشكلة؟
- هل ظهرت المشكلة عدة مرات؟ كل مرة؟ بطريقة عشوائية؟
- إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
