• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.

I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim

• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)

I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA

I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim

• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟

I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim

• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟

I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim

• ما هو متصفحك؟