• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

Would it be possible to exclude some civs from the set up? Or allow each player to pick a specific Civ? The latter would have to be worked out in advance of the start of the game, I think. Having played many games of Tapestry I think it's fair to say that some Civs are just more fun to play and some are not - Some players considered the Futurists way over powered, and some wonder how the Chosen and Traders made it past play testing. All open to debate of course - Of course this is directly against the rules as written - but this is just a suggestion!

• ما هو متصفحك؟