• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.

So there are two issues with fingers and chunks that are really the same issue:

1. Rather than using the asset from the card, there's a new asset used for those items in your inventory, which doesn't appear on the cards and converters; this is -very- confusing for new players.

2. The "new" assets uses for fingers/chunks is visually confusing and almost identical to one another; it takes a lot of time staring at the screen to distinguish between them. It took me -multiple- games to realize they're not the same image and that the game implementation actually does distinguish between fingers and chunks, and even then it always takes extra time for me to be sure I don't get it wrong in a game.

Good solutions could be either:

1. isolate the fingers/chunks resource in the game assets and use that in game as well.
PRO: IT's the easiest answer, since it involves only swapping out the game assets.
CON: I'm guessing there's a reason that this wasn't how this was implemented before.
CON2: Honestly even the in-game assets aren't that great; they're the same color so it's pretty easy to confuse them if they aren't blown up enough to see the difference. Way better than "a brown bar with some dark lines against it", but still not that great.

or

2. Improve the in-game assets so they're clean and easier to distinguish, make a "fingers or chunks" icon taht is compatable with those, and use them in the cards in-game rather than continuing to use cards that don't match the pieces.
PRO: It would result in a very clear game that was also more accessible.
CON: It would be a lot more work.
CON: THe cards in the game would no longer look identical to the printed game.

• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

So there are two issues with fingers and chunks that are really the same issue:

1. Rather than using the asset from the card, there's a new asset used for those items in your inventory, which doesn't appear on the cards and converters; this is -very- confusing for new players.

2. The "new" assets uses for fingers/chunks is visually confusing and almost identical to one another; it takes a lot of time staring at the screen to distinguish between them. It took me -multiple- games to realize they're not the same image and that the game implementation actually does distinguish between fingers and chunks, and even then it always takes extra time for me to be sure I don't get it wrong in a game.

Good solutions could be either:

1. isolate the fingers/chunks resource in the game assets and use that in game as well.
PRO: IT's the easiest answer, since it involves only swapping out the game assets.
CON: I'm guessing there's a reason that this wasn't how this was implemented before.
CON2: Honestly even the in-game assets aren't that great; they're the same color so it's pretty easy to confuse them if they aren't blown up enough to see the difference. Way better than "a brown bar with some dark lines against it", but still not that great.

or

2. Improve the in-game assets so they're clean and easier to distinguish, make a "fingers or chunks" icon taht is compatable with those, and use them in the cards in-game rather than continuing to use cards that don't match the pieces.
PRO: It would result in a very clear game that was also more accessible.
CON: It would be a lot more work.
CON: THe cards in the game would no longer look identical to the printed game.

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

So there are two issues with fingers and chunks that are really the same issue:

1. Rather than using the asset from the card, there's a new asset used for those items in your inventory, which doesn't appear on the cards and converters; this is -very- confusing for new players.

2. The "new" assets uses for fingers/chunks is visually confusing and almost identical to one another; it takes a lot of time staring at the screen to distinguish between them. It took me -multiple- games to realize they're not the same image and that the game implementation actually does distinguish between fingers and chunks, and even then it always takes extra time for me to be sure I don't get it wrong in a game.

Good solutions could be either:

1. isolate the fingers/chunks resource in the game assets and use that in game as well.
PRO: IT's the easiest answer, since it involves only swapping out the game assets.
CON: I'm guessing there's a reason that this wasn't how this was implemented before.
CON2: Honestly even the in-game assets aren't that great; they're the same color so it's pretty easy to confuse them if they aren't blown up enough to see the difference. Way better than "a brown bar with some dark lines against it", but still not that great.

or

2. Improve the in-game assets so they're clean and easier to distinguish, make a "fingers or chunks" icon taht is compatable with those, and use them in the cards in-game rather than continuing to use cards that don't match the pieces.
PRO: It would result in a very clear game that was also more accessible.
CON: It would be a lot more work.
CON: THe cards in the game would no longer look identical to the printed game.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)

So there are two issues with fingers and chunks that are really the same issue:

1. Rather than using the asset from the card, there's a new asset used for those items in your inventory, which doesn't appear on the cards and converters; this is -very- confusing for new players.

2. The "new" assets uses for fingers/chunks is visually confusing and almost identical to one another; it takes a lot of time staring at the screen to distinguish between them. It took me -multiple- games to realize they're not the same image and that the game implementation actually does distinguish between fingers and chunks, and even then it always takes extra time for me to be sure I don't get it wrong in a game.

Good solutions could be either:

1. isolate the fingers/chunks resource in the game assets and use that in game as well.
PRO: IT's the easiest answer, since it involves only swapping out the game assets.
CON: I'm guessing there's a reason that this wasn't how this was implemented before.
CON2: Honestly even the in-game assets aren't that great; they're the same color so it's pretty easy to confuse them if they aren't blown up enough to see the difference. Way better than "a brown bar with some dark lines against it", but still not that great.

or

2. Improve the in-game assets so they're clean and easier to distinguish, make a "fingers or chunks" icon taht is compatable with those, and use them in the cards in-game rather than continuing to use cards that don't match the pieces.
PRO: It would result in a very clear game that was also more accessible.
CON: It would be a lot more work.
CON: THe cards in the game would no longer look identical to the printed game.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA

So there are two issues with fingers and chunks that are really the same issue:

1. Rather than using the asset from the card, there's a new asset used for those items in your inventory, which doesn't appear on the cards and converters; this is -very- confusing for new players.

2. The "new" assets uses for fingers/chunks is visually confusing and almost identical to one another; it takes a lot of time staring at the screen to distinguish between them. It took me -multiple- games to realize they're not the same image and that the game implementation actually does distinguish between fingers and chunks, and even then it always takes extra time for me to be sure I don't get it wrong in a game.

Good solutions could be either:

1. isolate the fingers/chunks resource in the game assets and use that in game as well.
PRO: IT's the easiest answer, since it involves only swapping out the game assets.
CON: I'm guessing there's a reason that this wasn't how this was implemented before.
CON2: Honestly even the in-game assets aren't that great; they're the same color so it's pretty easy to confuse them if they aren't blown up enough to see the difference. Way better than "a brown bar with some dark lines against it", but still not that great.

or

2. Improve the in-game assets so they're clean and easier to distinguish, make a "fingers or chunks" icon taht is compatable with those, and use them in the cards in-game rather than continuing to use cards that don't match the pieces.
PRO: It would result in a very clear game that was also more accessible.
CON: It would be a lot more work.
CON: THe cards in the game would no longer look identical to the printed game.

• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟

So there are two issues with fingers and chunks that are really the same issue:

1. Rather than using the asset from the card, there's a new asset used for those items in your inventory, which doesn't appear on the cards and converters; this is -very- confusing for new players.

2. The "new" assets uses for fingers/chunks is visually confusing and almost identical to one another; it takes a lot of time staring at the screen to distinguish between them. It took me -multiple- games to realize they're not the same image and that the game implementation actually does distinguish between fingers and chunks, and even then it always takes extra time for me to be sure I don't get it wrong in a game.

Good solutions could be either:

1. isolate the fingers/chunks resource in the game assets and use that in game as well.
PRO: IT's the easiest answer, since it involves only swapping out the game assets.
CON: I'm guessing there's a reason that this wasn't how this was implemented before.
CON2: Honestly even the in-game assets aren't that great; they're the same color so it's pretty easy to confuse them if they aren't blown up enough to see the difference. Way better than "a brown bar with some dark lines against it", but still not that great.

or

2. Improve the in-game assets so they're clean and easier to distinguish, make a "fingers or chunks" icon taht is compatable with those, and use them in the cards in-game rather than continuing to use cards that don't match the pieces.
PRO: It would result in a very clear game that was also more accessible.
CON: It would be a lot more work.
CON: THe cards in the game would no longer look identical to the printed game.

• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟

So there are two issues with fingers and chunks that are really the same issue:

1. Rather than using the asset from the card, there's a new asset used for those items in your inventory, which doesn't appear on the cards and converters; this is -very- confusing for new players.

2. The "new" assets uses for fingers/chunks is visually confusing and almost identical to one another; it takes a lot of time staring at the screen to distinguish between them. It took me -multiple- games to realize they're not the same image and that the game implementation actually does distinguish between fingers and chunks, and even then it always takes extra time for me to be sure I don't get it wrong in a game.

Good solutions could be either:

1. isolate the fingers/chunks resource in the game assets and use that in game as well.
PRO: IT's the easiest answer, since it involves only swapping out the game assets.
CON: I'm guessing there's a reason that this wasn't how this was implemented before.
CON2: Honestly even the in-game assets aren't that great; they're the same color so it's pretty easy to confuse them if they aren't blown up enough to see the difference. Way better than "a brown bar with some dark lines against it", but still not that great.

or

2. Improve the in-game assets so they're clean and easier to distinguish, make a "fingers or chunks" icon taht is compatable with those, and use them in the cards in-game rather than continuing to use cards that don't match the pieces.
PRO: It would result in a very clear game that was also more accessible.
CON: It would be a lot more work.
CON: THe cards in the game would no longer look identical to the printed game.

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

So there are two issues with fingers and chunks that are really the same issue:

1. Rather than using the asset from the card, there's a new asset used for those items in your inventory, which doesn't appear on the cards and converters; this is -very- confusing for new players.

2. The "new" assets uses for fingers/chunks is visually confusing and almost identical to one another; it takes a lot of time staring at the screen to distinguish between them. It took me -multiple- games to realize they're not the same image and that the game implementation actually does distinguish between fingers and chunks, and even then it always takes extra time for me to be sure I don't get it wrong in a game.

Good solutions could be either:

1. isolate the fingers/chunks resource in the game assets and use that in game as well.
PRO: IT's the easiest answer, since it involves only swapping out the game assets.
CON: I'm guessing there's a reason that this wasn't how this was implemented before.
CON2: Honestly even the in-game assets aren't that great; they're the same color so it's pretty easy to confuse them if they aren't blown up enough to see the difference. Way better than "a brown bar with some dark lines against it", but still not that great.

or

2. Improve the in-game assets so they're clean and easier to distinguish, make a "fingers or chunks" icon taht is compatable with those, and use them in the cards in-game rather than continuing to use cards that don't match the pieces.
PRO: It would result in a very clear game that was also more accessible.
CON: It would be a lot more work.
CON: THe cards in the game would no longer look identical to the printed game.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

So there are two issues with fingers and chunks that are really the same issue:

1. Rather than using the asset from the card, there's a new asset used for those items in your inventory, which doesn't appear on the cards and converters; this is -very- confusing for new players.

2. The "new" assets uses for fingers/chunks is visually confusing and almost identical to one another; it takes a lot of time staring at the screen to distinguish between them. It took me -multiple- games to realize they're not the same image and that the game implementation actually does distinguish between fingers and chunks, and even then it always takes extra time for me to be sure I don't get it wrong in a game.

Good solutions could be either:

1. isolate the fingers/chunks resource in the game assets and use that in game as well.
PRO: IT's the easiest answer, since it involves only swapping out the game assets.
CON: I'm guessing there's a reason that this wasn't how this was implemented before.
CON2: Honestly even the in-game assets aren't that great; they're the same color so it's pretty easy to confuse them if they aren't blown up enough to see the difference. Way better than "a brown bar with some dark lines against it", but still not that great.

or

2. Improve the in-game assets so they're clean and easier to distinguish, make a "fingers or chunks" icon taht is compatable with those, and use them in the cards in-game rather than continuing to use cards that don't match the pieces.
PRO: It would result in a very clear game that was also more accessible.
CON: It would be a lot more work.
CON: THe cards in the game would no longer look identical to the printed game.

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

So there are two issues with fingers and chunks that are really the same issue:

1. Rather than using the asset from the card, there's a new asset used for those items in your inventory, which doesn't appear on the cards and converters; this is -very- confusing for new players.

2. The "new" assets uses for fingers/chunks is visually confusing and almost identical to one another; it takes a lot of time staring at the screen to distinguish between them. It took me -multiple- games to realize they're not the same image and that the game implementation actually does distinguish between fingers and chunks, and even then it always takes extra time for me to be sure I don't get it wrong in a game.

Good solutions could be either:

1. isolate the fingers/chunks resource in the game assets and use that in game as well.
PRO: IT's the easiest answer, since it involves only swapping out the game assets.
CON: I'm guessing there's a reason that this wasn't how this was implemented before.
CON2: Honestly even the in-game assets aren't that great; they're the same color so it's pretty easy to confuse them if they aren't blown up enough to see the difference. Way better than "a brown bar with some dark lines against it", but still not that great.

or

2. Improve the in-game assets so they're clean and easier to distinguish, make a "fingers or chunks" icon taht is compatable with those, and use them in the cards in-game rather than continuing to use cards that don't match the pieces.
PRO: It would result in a very clear game that was also more accessible.
CON: It would be a lot more work.
CON: THe cards in the game would no longer look identical to the printed game.

• ما هو متصفحك؟