أبلغ عن • Board Game Arena

جميع التقارير

تقارير Carcassonne (كاركاسون)

#6273: "No scoring for farmers at the end"

notabug: هذا ليس خطأ

ما هو هذا التقرير؟

Carcassonne (كاركاسون) #25695966

ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه

القواعد: لم يتم احترام قاعدة اللعبة

ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه

القواعد: لم يتم احترام قاعدة اللعبة

يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع

إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، يرجى التصويت لهذا التقرير. يتم إعطاء التقارير ذات أكبر عدد من الأصوات الأولوية!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

وصف مفصل

سجل التاريخ

Dec 1 st 2016 11:22 • waterbomber • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Nothing to add.

Dec 3 rd 2016 21:36 • Quasars • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

In a 2-player game, one player had no farmers scored at all. Even they were in a position to gain some points.
The game was Carcassonne #25756976.

Dec 5 th 2016 21:51 • Quasars • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Correction, I replayed the game in question step by step and there were meeples hidden far away behind another city (so the scoring was based on majority first).
It is the difficult to follow rules which cause this confusion.
The scoring was correct in the above mentioned game I wrongly added to report as bugged.

Jan 15 th 2020 21:29 • DianaMax • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

In my last Carcassonne game, I had the same problem. 4 farmers, but only two counted.

Mar 23 rd 2020 00:34 • YumeMari • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Les partisans présent dans les prés ne sont pas tous comptabilisés, quand le jeu affiche la fin de la partie, il en reste sur le plateau et aucun +... n'a était affiché.
=> Règles spéciales mises : Régles de la 1ere version pour le comptage des points des prés, Extension La Rivière, Extension 1 Auberges et Cathédrales

Mar 29 th 2020 21:05 • gbertu • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

The original Bug was reported incorrectly. On Table #25695966, the final score is correct. The yellow player have 4 farmers, and the black player have 3 farmers. Then all farmer's point go to yellow player because it have the majority.

YumeMari, on your table ID #67861275, the farmers stays always on table when the game ends, but you don't win any point for your farmers, because you don't have any city completed around your farmers.
The rules say: Each completed city adjacent to a field you occupy gives you 3 points

DianaMax, please, can you report the exact table ID?

I think that this bug can be closed.

Apr 17 th 2020 20:15 • Calyptia • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Table #75725464. 4 players game. I played on computer (mozilla). At the end one field had 1 farmer from each player except two who were mine. Nobody scored any points with this field. I was supposed to win. I lost.

Table #75725464. 4 joueurs. Je jouais sur un PC (mozilla). A la fin du jeu, un champ possédait 1 paysan de chaque joueur sauf moi qui en avait 2. Personne n'a marqué de point avec ce champ en fin de partie. J'étais supposée gagner, j'ai perdu.

Apr 18 th 2020 16:47 • Jayknight • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Same for table 76107029, three players, i'm the only one who didn't get points for the big field we all shared, it would have made me win the party but i lost because of it

Apr 25 th 2020 14:01 • Robo65 • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Calyptia, I can understand if it's a sore point for a french girl if one of those renegade colonists in Canada steals your farm and your victory, so maybe your eyes feared to report that to your mind, but they did.

At the end, jkeays had three meeples on that farm AND he got the 21 points for it. No bug at table #75725464.

Apr 25 th 2020 14:16 • Robo65 • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Kayknight, you are mistaken. Table 76107029 is correct, too.

When you placed your pig, the game shows only one red meeple on that farm (near the river source), but Krikrou already had two (one at the river, the other one 6 tiles to the right) and his pig. That second meeple might be difficult to see, depending on the color calibration of your display, but it's there.

At that point, Katchatcha had one meeple on the other side of the river, connected around that one-street cloister to the left side.

And shortly after your pig, Katchatcha added his second meeple and his pig from the south.

So, it's 1 - 2 - 2, and zero points for you.

May 10 th 2020 05:48 • Magicalyn • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

I had a similar issue
Table number:85575875

Scoring was set to "International variant" where all farmers should have been scored, but it seems that they were scored by "first edition rules" where majority determines points.

May 19 th 2020 15:49 • Nodens77 • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

#88595690
I' veThe same problem.

Scoring was set to "International variant" where all farmers should have been scored, but it seems that they were scored by "first edition rules" where majority determines points.

May 19 th 2020 16:36 • diamant • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

In the referenced game, the 3 black farmers were outnumbered by 4 yellow farmers, so the yellow player scored for the towns, and there was no bug.
gbertu had previously reported that this report was incorrect. So please stop adding testimony, because there will be very little credit for it.

Jun 21 st 2020 23:56 • leebc • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Table #97019980

5 players. At end scoring we think the yellow player scored the field with 2 meeple farmers and a pig, but black and blue also had 2 farmers and a pig.

Jun 24 th 2020 14:43 • Salorak • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Table Carcassonne n°93550149
Farmer no score a red player, only a blue player

imgur.com/Tj0NWpu

Jul 16 th 2020 16:53 • Chris Hoskins • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Table #101719311
At the end of the game one field was left unscored, although the rest were scored as normal, this led to a player ranking lower in the final result than they should have.

Jul 29 th 2020 13:57 • apollo1001 • هذا ليس خطأ:

Thank you for the reports. Most of these have been identified as erroneous by other players (thank you to those who have investigated them and provided clarifications).

I'll clear up the final few here:
@Magicalyn, @Nodens77: Both variants score via majority. The difference is that the international variant is done on a field by field basis, whereas the first edition did it city by city.
@leebc: Check the replay, all 3 players scored the field.
@salorak: The red farmer was outnumbered by the blue player - you must have the 'majority' in each field.
@Chris Hoskins: You have only 1 farmer. Blue/Yellow had 2 each so they had the majority and thus got points.

I can finally close this report as definitely not a bug.

اضف لهذا البلاغ

الرجاء إضافة أي شيء يبدو هنا ذا صلة من أجل إعادة إنتاج هذا الخطأ أو فهم اقتراحك:

تعريف طاولة/تعريف حركة
هل حلَت F5 المشكلة؟
هل ظهرت المشكلة عدة مرات؟ كل مرة؟ بطريقة عشوائية؟
إذا لديك لقطة شاشة عن هذا الخطأ (من المفضل)، يمكنك استخدام خدمة إستضافة للصور من اختيارك (snipboard.io مثلاً) لتحميلها و نسخ/لصق الرابط هنا.

إلغاء تحديث التقرير

#6273: "No scoring for farmers at the end"

ما هو هذا التقرير؟

ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه

ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه

يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع

وصف مفصل

سجل التاريخ

اضف لهذا البلاغ

تغيير حالة التقرير إلى:

مساعدة

ساهم

التنقل

تابعنا