#68042: "Introduce a turbo variant where you pick all you diplomacy bonuses at the start of your turn "
ما هو هذا التقرير؟
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع
إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، يرجى التصويت لهذا التقرير. يتم إعطاء التقارير ذات أكبر عدد من الأصوات الأولوية!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
وصف مفصل
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.
It is a great implementation but the asynchronous games are very slow, mostly to the constant picking of the diplomacy bonuses in higher player games. I think the gain in game speed (the new total playtime will be something like 1/x of the current playtime where is x is number of players) greatly would outdo the disadvantages (you can make your diplomacy benefit decisions with total knowledge of what resources you will start your turn with). An example of this is the oracle of delphi implementation on yucata which results in much faster gameplay.
-
• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v103
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
It is a great implementation but the asynchronous games are very slow, mostly to the constant picking of the diplomacy bonuses in higher player games. I think the gain in game speed (the new total playtime will be something like 1/x of the current playtime where is x is number of players) greatly would outdo the disadvantages (you can make your diplomacy benefit decisions with total knowledge of what resources you will start your turn with). An example of this is the oracle of delphi implementation on yucata which results in much faster gameplay.
-
• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v103
-
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
It is a great implementation but the asynchronous games are very slow, mostly to the constant picking of the diplomacy bonuses in higher player games. I think the gain in game speed (the new total playtime will be something like 1/x of the current playtime where is x is number of players) greatly would outdo the disadvantages (you can make your diplomacy benefit decisions with total knowledge of what resources you will start your turn with). An example of this is the oracle of delphi implementation on yucata which results in much faster gameplay.
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v103
-
• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)
It is a great implementation but the asynchronous games are very slow, mostly to the constant picking of the diplomacy bonuses in higher player games. I think the gain in game speed (the new total playtime will be something like 1/x of the current playtime where is x is number of players) greatly would outdo the disadvantages (you can make your diplomacy benefit decisions with total knowledge of what resources you will start your turn with). An example of this is the oracle of delphi implementation on yucata which results in much faster gameplay.
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v103
-
• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA
It is a great implementation but the asynchronous games are very slow, mostly to the constant picking of the diplomacy bonuses in higher player games. I think the gain in game speed (the new total playtime will be something like 1/x of the current playtime where is x is number of players) greatly would outdo the disadvantages (you can make your diplomacy benefit decisions with total knowledge of what resources you will start your turn with). An example of this is the oracle of delphi implementation on yucata which results in much faster gameplay.
-
• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v103
-
• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟
It is a great implementation but the asynchronous games are very slow, mostly to the constant picking of the diplomacy bonuses in higher player games. I think the gain in game speed (the new total playtime will be something like 1/x of the current playtime where is x is number of players) greatly would outdo the disadvantages (you can make your diplomacy benefit decisions with total knowledge of what resources you will start your turn with). An example of this is the oracle of delphi implementation on yucata which results in much faster gameplay.
-
• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟
-
• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v103
-
• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟
It is a great implementation but the asynchronous games are very slow, mostly to the constant picking of the diplomacy bonuses in higher player games. I think the gain in game speed (the new total playtime will be something like 1/x of the current playtime where is x is number of players) greatly would outdo the disadvantages (you can make your diplomacy benefit decisions with total knowledge of what resources you will start your turn with). An example of this is the oracle of delphi implementation on yucata which results in much faster gameplay.
-
• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v103
-
• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
It is a great implementation but the asynchronous games are very slow, mostly to the constant picking of the diplomacy bonuses in higher player games. I think the gain in game speed (the new total playtime will be something like 1/x of the current playtime where is x is number of players) greatly would outdo the disadvantages (you can make your diplomacy benefit decisions with total knowledge of what resources you will start your turn with). An example of this is the oracle of delphi implementation on yucata which results in much faster gameplay.
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v103
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
It is a great implementation but the asynchronous games are very slow, mostly to the constant picking of the diplomacy bonuses in higher player games. I think the gain in game speed (the new total playtime will be something like 1/x of the current playtime where is x is number of players) greatly would outdo the disadvantages (you can make your diplomacy benefit decisions with total knowledge of what resources you will start your turn with). An example of this is the oracle of delphi implementation on yucata which results in much faster gameplay.
-
• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v103
-
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
It is a great implementation but the asynchronous games are very slow, mostly to the constant picking of the diplomacy bonuses in higher player games. I think the gain in game speed (the new total playtime will be something like 1/x of the current playtime where is x is number of players) greatly would outdo the disadvantages (you can make your diplomacy benefit decisions with total knowledge of what resources you will start your turn with). An example of this is the oracle of delphi implementation on yucata which results in much faster gameplay.
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v103
سجل التاريخ
Here's the way it'll work:
1) For each diplomacy track, you'll be able to select "always ask", "2 GEMs", "1 VP", "Resource", or "last reward taken for this track"
2) If the indicated reward is available for that track when the action is taken, the game will automatically pick it for you. (If not, it'll ask you like normal.)
3) If you ever advance on that diplomacy track, the game will automatically reset your choice to "always ask" so that you don't forget to switch it to a better choice. Otherwise, it's up to you to change your choice when you no longer want that particular reward. If you think you'll want two different rewards on before it comes back to you, you should set it to "always ask"
The selection was chosen because it strikes a balance between flexibility (choosing what you want) and interface simplicity (as opposed to a pull-down menu with every possible combination of which two elements you could pick at some tiers or programming in a long sequence of what you want).
I've just completed testing the backend logic to ensure that everything works. It'll require the other developer to implement an interface for it, which may take a little while. Still, you'll hopefully appreciate an update of what's in the works.
an example metal-point-food-water-2gems-1gem
then it will pick the highest possible rewards according to the slider. it also works for the double rewards
The method described was chosen because it strikes a balance between flexibility (choosing what you want) and interface simplicity.
We'll keep an eye on it. If it's causing more player confusion than it solves, we may tweak or remove it.
There were some early implantation issues causing it to spontaneously reset, but those should be resolved now.
اضف لهذا البلاغ
- تعريف طاولة/تعريف حركة
- هل حلَت F5 المشكلة؟
- هل ظهرت المشكلة عدة مرات؟ كل مرة؟ بطريقة عشوائية؟
- إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
