#70845: "Recommend logging played cards as "<Username> played a <Combo>, <Card Value> of <Suit>"
ما هو هذا التقرير؟
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع
إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، يرجى التصويت لهذا التقرير. يتم إعطاء التقارير ذات أكبر عدد من الأصوات الأولوية!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
وصف مفصل
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.
I noticed that there is some inconsistency with the log messages.
- Singles: played a <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Doubles: played a Double <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Triples: played a Triple <Card Value> of Suit>
- Quadruples:
- Straight: played a X card straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Double Straight: played a X card Double Straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
With this renaming, it would be consistent across all combinations, values, and suits. Also it would avoid having it to read grammatically like singles currently do for pairs, e.g, played a Pair 3 of Hearts -
• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v104
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
I noticed that there is some inconsistency with the log messages.
- Singles: played a <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Doubles: played a Double <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Triples: played a Triple <Card Value> of Suit>
- Quadruples:
- Straight: played a X card straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Double Straight: played a X card Double Straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
With this renaming, it would be consistent across all combinations, values, and suits. Also it would avoid having it to read grammatically like singles currently do for pairs, e.g, played a Pair 3 of Hearts -
• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v104
-
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
I noticed that there is some inconsistency with the log messages.
- Singles: played a <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Doubles: played a Double <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Triples: played a Triple <Card Value> of Suit>
- Quadruples:
- Straight: played a X card straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Double Straight: played a X card Double Straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
With this renaming, it would be consistent across all combinations, values, and suits. Also it would avoid having it to read grammatically like singles currently do for pairs, e.g, played a Pair 3 of Hearts • ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v104
-
• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)
I noticed that there is some inconsistency with the log messages.
- Singles: played a <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Doubles: played a Double <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Triples: played a Triple <Card Value> of Suit>
- Quadruples:
- Straight: played a X card straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Double Straight: played a X card Double Straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
With this renaming, it would be consistent across all combinations, values, and suits. Also it would avoid having it to read grammatically like singles currently do for pairs, e.g, played a Pair 3 of Hearts • ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v104
-
• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA
I noticed that there is some inconsistency with the log messages.
- Singles: played a <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Doubles: played a Double <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Triples: played a Triple <Card Value> of Suit>
- Quadruples:
- Straight: played a X card straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Double Straight: played a X card Double Straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
With this renaming, it would be consistent across all combinations, values, and suits. Also it would avoid having it to read grammatically like singles currently do for pairs, e.g, played a Pair 3 of Hearts -
• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v104
-
• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟
I noticed that there is some inconsistency with the log messages.
- Singles: played a <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Doubles: played a Double <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Triples: played a Triple <Card Value> of Suit>
- Quadruples:
- Straight: played a X card straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Double Straight: played a X card Double Straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
With this renaming, it would be consistent across all combinations, values, and suits. Also it would avoid having it to read grammatically like singles currently do for pairs, e.g, played a Pair 3 of Hearts -
• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟
-
• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v104
-
• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟
I noticed that there is some inconsistency with the log messages.
- Singles: played a <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Doubles: played a Double <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Triples: played a Triple <Card Value> of Suit>
- Quadruples:
- Straight: played a X card straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Double Straight: played a X card Double Straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
With this renaming, it would be consistent across all combinations, values, and suits. Also it would avoid having it to read grammatically like singles currently do for pairs, e.g, played a Pair 3 of Hearts -
• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v104
-
• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
I noticed that there is some inconsistency with the log messages.
- Singles: played a <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Doubles: played a Double <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Triples: played a Triple <Card Value> of Suit>
- Quadruples:
- Straight: played a X card straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Double Straight: played a X card Double Straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
With this renaming, it would be consistent across all combinations, values, and suits. Also it would avoid having it to read grammatically like singles currently do for pairs, e.g, played a Pair 3 of Hearts • ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v104
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
I noticed that there is some inconsistency with the log messages.
- Singles: played a <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Doubles: played a Double <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Triples: played a Triple <Card Value> of Suit>
- Quadruples:
- Straight: played a X card straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Double Straight: played a X card Double Straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
With this renaming, it would be consistent across all combinations, values, and suits. Also it would avoid having it to read grammatically like singles currently do for pairs, e.g, played a Pair 3 of Hearts -
• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v104
-
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
I noticed that there is some inconsistency with the log messages.
- Singles: played a <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Doubles: played a Double <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Triples: played a Triple <Card Value> of Suit>
- Quadruples:
- Straight: played a X card straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
- Double Straight: played a X card Double Straight, <Card Value> of <Suit>
With this renaming, it would be consistent across all combinations, values, and suits. Also it would avoid having it to read grammatically like singles currently do for pairs, e.g, played a Pair 3 of Hearts • ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v104
سجل التاريخ
اضف لهذا البلاغ
- تعريف طاولة/تعريف حركة
- هل حلَت F5 المشكلة؟
- هل ظهرت المشكلة عدة مرات؟ كل مرة؟ بطريقة عشوائية؟
- إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
