• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.

In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks

• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث

Final - part of scoring.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

Final - part of scoring.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)

In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA

In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks

• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟

Final - part of scoring.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟

In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks

• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟

Final - part of scoring.

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟

In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

Final - part of scoring.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

Final - part of scoring.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

In a 3 person game (table: 346901601), in one quadrant, there was a clear winner for the lords card (green with 17), but the other 2 players were tied (red and blue each with 10) - the red and blue player should have tied for second on the Lords card and each received 6 points. I'm sure this was previously the implementation - Is this understanding now different or was the final score wrong? Thanks

• ما هو متصفحك؟