• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟

• ما هو متصفحك؟

• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.

Especially in the early game, the shown food requirement is wrong. It always shows the requirement from the *last* turn. For example, if food cost was normal (say, 6 for 3 dwarves), it will show 6. IF in the same situation, a half harvest had passed, the game will show 3. This will happen even in phases where the next feeding requirement is known.

I suggest the feeding requirement is updated **after** feeding phase to reflect the next feeding cost. A question mark should be shown if it is now known, or perhaps x(max), where max reflects the maximum possible value for the next feeding phase based on the possible alternatives left.

• ما هو متصفحك؟