#95869: "Translation issue for number of combat cards in the English rules"
ما هو هذا التقرير؟
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه
يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع
إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، يرجى التصويت لهذا التقرير. يتم إعطاء التقارير ذات أكبر عدد من الأصوات الأولوية!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
وصف مفصل
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق رسالة الخطأ التي تراها على الشاشة ، إن وجدت.
I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".
Looking at the original French versus the English:
Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.
vs
Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.
I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.
If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.
In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:
* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.
This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".
-
• يرجى توضيح ما تريد القيام به ، ماذا فعلت وما حدث
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v114
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".
Looking at the original French versus the English:
Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.
vs
Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.
I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.
If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.
In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:
* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.
This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".
-
• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v114
-
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".
Looking at the original French versus the English:
Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.
vs
Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.
I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.
If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.
In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:
* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.
This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v114
-
• ما الذي تم عرضه على الشاشة عندما تم حظرك (شاشة فارغة؟ جزء من واجهة اللعبة؟ رسالة خطأ؟)
I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".
Looking at the original French versus the English:
Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.
vs
Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.
I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.
If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.
In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:
* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.
This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v114
-
• أي جزء من القواعد تم مخالفته في تصميم التبني لدى BGA
I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".
Looking at the original French versus the English:
Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.
vs
Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.
I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.
If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.
In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:
* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.
This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".
-
• هل انتهاك القواعد مرئي عند إعادة اللعب؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فبأي رقم؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v114
-
• ما هو نشاط اللعبة الذي أردت القيام به؟
I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".
Looking at the original French versus the English:
Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.
vs
Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.
I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.
If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.
In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:
* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.
This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".
-
• ماذا تحاول أن تفعل لتحريك هذا العمل اللعبة؟
-
• ماذا حدث عند محاولة القيام بهذا (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v114
-
• في أي خطوة من اللعبة حدثت المشكلة (ما هو تعليمة اللعبة الحالية)؟
I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".
Looking at the original French versus the English:
Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.
vs
Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.
I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.
If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.
In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:
* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.
This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".
-
• ماذا حدث عند محاولة إجراء هذه الحركة داخل اللعبة (رسالة خطأ ، رسالة شريط حالة اللعبة ، ...)؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v114
-
• يرجى وصف مشكلة العرض. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".
Looking at the original French versus the English:
Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.
vs
Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.
I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.
If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.
In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:
* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.
This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v114
-
• يرجى نسخ / لصق النص المعروض باللغة الإنجليزية بدلاً من لغتك. إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".
Looking at the original French versus the English:
Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.
vs
Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.
I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.
If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.
In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:
* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.
This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".
-
• هل هذا النص متاح في translation system ؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، فهل تمت ترجمتها لأكثر من 24 ساعة؟
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v114
-
• يرجى توضيح اقتراحك بدقة وإيجاز بحيث يكون من السهل قدر الإمكان فهم ما تعنيه.
I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".
Looking at the original French versus the English:
Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.
vs
Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.
I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.
If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.
In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:
* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.
This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".
• ما هو متصفحك؟
Google Chrome v114
سجل التاريخ
I can change the wiki, no problem.
And I will show your report to the publisher. As far as I know, the games are being printed right now but this could be added to a FAQ or adjusted in a future printing.
Thanks!
Thank you for taking the time to write all of this and helping to make the game better!
I'll close this improvement here!
اضف لهذا البلاغ
- تعريف طاولة/تعريف حركة
- هل حلَت F5 المشكلة؟
- هل ظهرت المشكلة عدة مرات؟ كل مرة؟ بطريقة عشوائية؟
- إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.
