أبلغ عن • Board Game Arena

جميع التقارير

تقارير pi_displayed

#9837: "When using the investigator, it sometimes gives false information. "

fixed: تم إصلاح العلة

ما هو هذا التقرير؟

pi #40106519

ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه

القواعد: لم يتم احترام قاعدة اللعبة

ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه

القواعد: لم يتم احترام قاعدة اللعبة

يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع

إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، يرجى التصويت لهذا التقرير. يتم إعطاء التقارير ذات أكبر عدد من الأصوات الأولوية!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

وصف مفصل

سجل التاريخ

May 7 th 2018 23:27 • Brisbane Roar • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

This problem didn't appear every time but I would definitely say there would be a mistake around 20% of the time when using investigator.

I think I understand why it's making that mistake, nonetheless it's a serious bug and right now I am asking all of my opponents to verify my information as well as their own to prevent suffering from the glitch.

May 7 th 2018 23:33 • gnocchi donkey • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

i also had this happen on game 40121344 where i had the trocadero card with adjacent cube then when i placed investigator on that space said no matches

May 8 th 2018 00:41 • fa81 • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Game 40106519 move #32 (lachimi going to Rick's Café) is correct: there *is* already a blue cube on Doc for the adjancency to Pop. Placing an investigator where there is already a disc or cube on a tile does *not* place another cube/tile for that aspect. The log message is a little misleading though, that is true. It should mention the full number of matches, I think. The token placement (existing cube stays on Doc; a disc is added on the investigator) is correct though: screenshotscdn.firefoxusercontent.com/images/e547f71c-d691-498e-ae90-c6e0e2c3c5c3.png

May 8 th 2018 00:55 • fa81 • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Table #40106519, Move #114: same situation. Already a cube on Downtown.

So, to improve the wording of the game log, I see two options:

1. "$player sent an investigator to $location. *New* matches: ...."
2. "$player sent an investigator to $location. Matches: $correctnumber"

If I go for 2., would it confuse players if it says, e.g. "matches: 1 exact, 1 adjacent" an then only 1 token appears on the investigator tile, because the other token is already on the aspect tile? Obviously moving the token from a tile to the investigator is not an option as this would reduce the amount information again (which doesn't make sense).

May 8 th 2018 01:03 • fa81 • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Table 40121344, gnocchi donkey: same.

May 8 th 2018 01:11 • fa81 • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Also — please correct me, I'm really not very good at the game itself — but usually it’s not a very good move to put an investigator where you already have some information. In some edge cases, yes, I can be the best option. But in the two situations I'm looking at right now there were better locations to go to to gain more knowledge ;)

May 8 th 2018 01:19 • fa81 • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

Quoting the official rules: “If you already have discs and/or cubes in the location then these
would be taken into consideration by the player holding the Case cards, making sure that a specific tile did not receive another disc or cube.“

So, if going by that, one could argue that the game log should as closely as possible imitate a real player, then the log should say something like: “Place 1 disc onto the investigator.”, really only talking about the new tokens.

May 8 th 2018 01:27 • fa81 • لم يتم اعادة انتاج الأخطاء من قبل المطورين حتى الآن:

“$player‘s investigator finds nothing new at $location.”

“$player‘s investigator finds new information at $location: X disc(s), Y cube(s).”

May 8 th 2018 01:41 • fa81 • يطلب المطورون المزيد من المعلومات لإعادة إنتاج هذا الخطأ:

Will try to fix that until Wednesday.

May 8 th 2018 05:15 • Brisbane Roar • يطلب المطورون المزيد من المعلومات لإعادة إنتاج هذا الخطأ:

Aha thx so much for your feedback fa81 and gnocchi. Yes I understand your point now, so you think just the log should be fixed? I still don't see the drawback to have the investigator always tell the 100% truth, I don't see how any confusion can come of that. And the idea to put the investigator on an evidence location is because they're trying to find out if it's the person, place, or crime that is the one adjacent.

May 8 th 2018 17:10 • Brisbane Roar • يطلب المطورون المزيد من المعلومات لإعادة إنتاج هذا الخطأ:

Ok so I see that you are absolutely right. What's causing the glitch is exactly what you described. A player puts the investigator on a location where they've already used evidence. Then the investigator no longer takes that into account. So perhaps just the log should be fixed.

May 8 th 2018 17:58 • e1q3z9c7 • يطلب المطورون المزيد من المعلومات لإعادة إنتاج هذا الخطأ:

yes, I'm really confused about it!!!

May 8 th 2018 18:07 • e1q3z9c7 • يطلب المطورون المزيد من المعلومات لإعادة إنتاج هذا الخطأ:

#40141874
#55
The answer is China Town, Knuckles, Bank job.
and I put my investigator on China Town square, which is neighbor of both Knuckles and Bank Job(there's a disc on Bank job). The right info should be "1 disc, 2 cubes", but it only shows "1 disc, 1 cube".

May 8 th 2018 18:27 • e1q3z9c7 • يطلب المطورون المزيد من المعلومات لإعادة إنتاج هذا الخطأ:

#40141874
#77
The answer is Doc, Trocadero, Jewellery Heist
I put my investigator on the square below Jewellery Heist(already had a disc on it), which is not neighbor others, but this time I got a cube, indicated "Jewellery Heist".

May 8 th 2018 18:59 • e1q3z9c7 • يطلب المطورون المزيد من المعلومات لإعادة إنتاج هذا الخطأ:

I'm sorry I think maybe it's my misread the rules:

"If you already have discs and/or cubes in the location then these would be taken into consideration by the player holding the Case cards, making sure that a specific tile did not receive another disc or cube."

On #40141874 #55
I already got a cube on that location and it's should be take into consideration, no duplicate info should given by investigator.

May 8 th 2018 21:19 • fa81 • تم إصلاح العلة:

Fix in version 180508-2114. Correct or adjacent matches that already have a token on the board are counted now when placing an investigator on the same location. Nothing changes regarding token movement; it's just the log that now mentions more matches.

May 8 th 2018 21:38 • Brisbane Roar • تم إصلاح العلة:

Awesome! Thx so much for the quick fix.

May 11 th 2018 10:10 • MikeIsMyIke • تم إصلاح العلة:

Another example of this bug on move 28 during the second round. en.2.boardgamearena.com/pi?table=40215285

Is there a way to make it more visually obvious when this happens? Perhaps animate the cube moving from the location to the investigator then back to the location?

May 11 th 2018 10:10 • MikeIsMyIke • تم إصلاح العلة:

Or at least include a more specific example in the how to play suggestion to clarify how this interaction works.

May 18 th 2018 17:40 • traddles27 • تم إصلاح العلة:

en.3.boardgamearena.com/pi?table=40424527 not fixed yet, as it seems. In game 2 of this table, PI shows me 1 relevant neighbour relevant to Trocadero (for red), round ends,there were 2 relevant neighbours in the end.

اضف لهذا البلاغ

الرجاء إضافة أي شيء يبدو هنا ذا صلة من أجل إعادة إنتاج هذا الخطأ أو فهم اقتراحك:

تعريف طاولة/تعريف حركة
هل حلَت F5 المشكلة؟
هل ظهرت المشكلة عدة مرات؟ كل مرة؟ بطريقة عشوائية؟
إذا كان لديك لقطة شاشة لهذا الخطأ (ممارسة جيدة) ، يمكنك استخدام Imgur.com لتحميله ونسخ / لصق الرابط هنا.

إلغاء تحديث التقرير

#9837: "When using the investigator, it sometimes gives false information. "

ما هو هذا التقرير؟

ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه

ماذا حدث؟ يرجى اختيار من أدناه

يرجى التحقق مما إذا كان هناك بالفعل تقرير عن نفس الموضوع

وصف مفصل

سجل التاريخ

اضف لهذا البلاغ

تغيير حالة التقرير إلى:

مساعدة

ساهم

التنقل

تابعنا